Posts Tagged ‘politics’

Cheney’s Grand Strategy…

Friday, May 22nd, 2009
  • He’s calling Congress’ bluff– he knows they’re too CYA’ing to ever indict, prosecute, let-alone impeach
  • He’s scoffing at all of us– firmly, emphaticly believing in his own entitled self-righteousness
  • …fergoshsakes, even a 7th-grader knows the “Office of VP” is -part- of the Executive Branch, & not a “Fourth Branch” of gov’t… despite all of Cheney’s “Man-sized Safes” & his own “More-Secret-than-Top-Secret” designations notwithstanding…

    …And thus we have Pundits galore, (hinting): “whom the Gods would destroy, they first make mad”
    …& saying Cheney is skating right on the razor’s edge of Nicholson in “A Few Good Men”, ie:

    Cruise: “Did you authorize that Code-Red?!”
    Nicholson: “You’re DAMN RIGHT I did!!”

    Basically:

    (random Faux Newscaster): “Did you approve of waterboarding (..) Islamic Prisoner?”
    Cheney: “You’re DAMN RIGHT I did!!”

    …& then it’s all: “Take him away, Baliff.”

    …but know what?
    That’s all a “West-Wing” wet dream.

    Here’s what’s Really Going to Happen:
    Cheney ain’t just whistling in the wind:

  • He knows he’ll never be indicted: Reid is too much the pantywaist
  • He knows he’ll never come to trial: Obama is too focused on ‘bipartisianship’, ‘respect for the Office’, & (shackled) to a policy of “don’t piss-off the true hard-liners in the military”
  • …but the Ultimate “get-outta-jail card?
    => No matter what happens, Cheney expects to Appeal to the Supreme Court.
    …Where he’s got 4 votes in his pocket..
    …Aaand a huge war-chest to (acquire) one more….
    …& then it’s “Bush vs Gore” all over again… But this time, w/ 2 even more hard-line Right-Wingers to ‘influence’ the swing-votes.

    & if Somehow Cheney still comes-up Short?
    Obama’ll just pardon him, & Cheney will live life a free man, (aiming) to rehabilitate his image a la Nixon. :-(

    No matter what happens, Cheney sees only upside in all this.

    He won’t even have to pull his Bush “Get-out-of-jail-Free” Memo, a la Rove & Miers…
    Heck, Cheney probably wrote one of his own, for himself.
    “Fourth Branch of Government”, indeed.

    RIP, “Rule of Law”…

    Rush Limbaugh: Loudly Authoritarian, Casually Factual, Blustering Hypocrite

    Saturday, April 18th, 2009

    What can we say about LIMBAUGH that hasn’t already been said before??

    Let’s start w/ a couple of Rush’s Favorite Systematic Logical Fallacies
    1) Straw Man: completely misrepresenting the opposing position, eg, taking a hyperbolic, outlying possible case & characterizing it as the “normal” or “generic” situation… Or simply “damning with faint praise”
    2. Argumentum Verbosim: to overwhelm with verbiage, leaving little room for cogent, point-for-point response (to wit, “baffle ‘em w/ bullshit”). This is Rush’s specialty; it’s inordinately simple to tear-apart his arguments, if you only can get him to write them down.
    3. Ad Hominem. Personal Attack. “Feminazis”, anyone? Or how about calling Chelsea Clinton the “White House Dog”?!
    4. Argument by Authority. He actually takes both sides of this fallacy:
    …a) Attacking EVERYONE ELSE’s authority
    “you need to listen to my show for 6weeks before I’ll bother listening to your criticism”
    …while for his part frequently quotes & plays clips out-of-context
    …b. Leveraging ‘Authorities’ which are highly-partisan, & frequently suspect:
    -Washington Post
    -David Brock on the Clintons

    .
    My ultimate FAVORITE Rush Hypocrisy?
    “Too many whites are getting away with drug use…Too many whites are getting away with drug sales…The answer is to go out and find the ones who are getting away with it, convict them and send them up the river, too.”, 5 October 1995, “The Rush Limbaugh Show”

    …let-alone “Operation Chaos“:
    Leo Jennings, a spokesperson for the office of the Ohio Attorney General, after Limbaugh urged Ohio Republicans to reregister as Democrats to disrupt the Democratic primary, which would be a FELONY if done with fraudulent intent, said: “We have no intention of prosecuting Rush Limbaugh because lying through your teeth and being stupid isn’t a crime.”

    .
    Here’s Rush’s 3 Favorite Defenses:
    1)’Republicans/Conservatives aren’t so bad– Democrats are JUST AS BAD
    …they’re just as corrupt; if they haven’t been caught yet, they will be
    2. No Republican Office-Holder is a “True Conservative”
    …so their [position/actions/etc] don’t affect True Conservatives
    …(this is most frequently used with Bush, McCain, Steele, etcetc)
    3. ‘My hypocrisy [prescription drug abuse, etc] is not significant compared to Liberals & MSM’

    This is Brilliant, really–
    …basically, if it’s really true that “Words mean things” (from Rush’s “35 Undeniable Truths”), & yet he constantly, repeatedly says incorrect, hyperbolic, illogical, factually-disproven things, & then when confronted systematically denies having said them, rephrases, &/or says “what I was really referring to”…

    Then by his Own Words– He’s Untrustworthy.

    Oh but wait– that’s “Okay”, b/c he’s an “Entertainer”.
    …ie, basically Seeking Attention, both Coming & Going
    1) Start w/ flagrant hyperbole
    2. Get on every media outlet possible, loudly trumpeting his own words
    3. Once confronted w/ actual facts, loudly deny he ever said it to begin with
    4. Next, grudgingly rephrase, ironically implying we ‘misunderstood’ him [cf "Words mean things"]
    5. Finally, triumphantly claim mistreatment by The Enemy [Liberals, MSM, Democrats, FemiNazis, Evolutionists, etcetcetc]

    This is not a “Leader”, “Pundit”, nor even an “Entertainer”
    Instead– he’s a DEMAGOGUE of the kind that H.L. Menken defined as “one who will preach doctrines he knows to be untrue to men he knows to be idiots.”

    Specifically, how’s about the “Dreaming of Riots in Denver” Incident?
    Rush: “With riots in Denver, the Democrat Convention would see to it that we don’t elect Democrats… That’s the best thing that could happen to the country.” (23 April 2008, his own Show)

    …which he promptly hedged, later in the same show, “I am not inspiring or inciting riots, I am ‘dreaming’ of riots in Denver.”

    MAKE NO MISTAKE–
    1) “Free Speach” does NOT INCLUDE yelling “Fire” in a crowded Theatre:

    The most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man falsely shouting fire in a theater and causing a panic. [...] The question in every case is whether the words used are used in such circumstances and are of such a nature as to create a clear and present danger that they will bring about the substantive evils that Congress has a right to prevent. –Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr

    2. The civilized world *DOES* hold “incitement to riot” as Actionable:

    On 3 December 2003, at “The International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda” in Arusha, life sentences were given RTLM (Radio Télévision Libre des Mille Collines) leaders Ferdinand Nahimana, and Jean Bosco Barayagwiza.
    They were convicted of genocide, incitement to genocide, and crimes against humanity, before and during the period of the genocides of 1994.

    Let’s finish-up w/ a word from a Republican, from Denver:
    “For any radio announcer to wish a riot on a city so his party could win, that’s disgraceful and it’s absurd.” Republican Denver Councilman Charles Brown, on Limbaugh’s speech about rioting in Denver; April 24, 2008; DenverPost.com

    Actually, that’s not just Absurd.
    That’s not just Hypocrisy: “We don’t riot. We don’t burn our cars. We don’t burn down our houses. We don’t kill our children. We don’t do half the things the American left does.” -Rush, DenverPost.com

    …it’s actually a FELONY

    But don’t hold your breath– Rush Limbaugh’ll NEVER be prosecuted
    …& if he is, he’ll dodge the very Discipline & Punishment he loudly proclaims for everyone else– like the TEN Felonies he plea-bargained out of, w/ his illegally-acquired & illegally-self-prescribing Oxycontin abuse…

    So there’s your Great Leader, Head of the Conservative Party, he of the 20 Millions “Dittos”.

    All Authoritarian Talk & Zero Conservative Walk…
    …preaching doctrines he knows to be untrue.

    “Free Market” at Merrill Lynch/etc really was “Free Lunch”…

    Thursday, December 18th, 2008

    We always knew this– ppl will live up (or down) to whatever is Expected of them.

    And so now, the Gov’t Regulators are belatedly realizing, ‘wow– all these mortgage traders were just focusing on short-term gains… regardless of future viability’.

    Well, OF COURSE they were. Hasn’t anyone ever hung-out w/ Sales-guys, at Quarter-End? By far & away the majority of them get panic-stricken if they’re below Quota… & they aren’t thinking about their own “future viability”, let-alone of their Company. And what are mortgage traders but basically glorified Sales-guys?

    And thus that’s exactly how the ‘Free Market’ works– despite all the paeans to long-term viability (““Those of us who have looked to the self-interest of lending institutions to protect shareholders’ equity, myself included, are in a state of shocked disbelief”, Alan Greenspan, once considered ‘The Oracle’, who presided over one of the longest Bull Markets ever)…

    …Instead it’s very simple:

    PEOPLE AREN’T INSTITUTIONS… People have their OWN “Self-Interest” in mind.

    And even if many, if not most ppl don’t act to ‘take-advantage’ of ‘grey-area’ situations… those that do more than make-up the difference.

    So if anyone says, “well, they didn’t know”– sure they did… just by the fact that nobody wanted to talk about how their “collateralized debt obligation” investments weren’t performing as well as expected, by mid ’2006… and yet they still sold them as much as they could(!)

    And if anyone wants to instead blame politics, ie

  • Who (forced) Fannie & Freddie to approve & back risky loans… [ie, that was passed by a Democrat Congress], -or-
  • Who actively, repeatedly campaigned Congress to do just that… [ie, Greenspan himself, a Republican and (previously) unabashed "Free Trader"... & even American Enterprise Institute's David Frum admits Bush W. campaigned banks heavily for it too], -or even-
  • Who (bypassed) the SEC guidelines allowing the ‘Big Five’ to maintain far less liquidity, ie actively encouraging them to make even more risky loans… [ie, Bush-appointed ex-trader]
  • All.That.Doesn’t.Matter. Both Parties blew it on this one!
    But regardless of who ‘set-up’ the situation, nobody ‘forced’ anybody to act unethically:
    1) Nobody “forced” these traders & trading companies to create those “C.D.O.”‘s, ie. actively hiding potentially risky loans, & rebranding them as AAA.
    2. Nobody “forced” the myriad lending institutions to take predatory practices, ie. mislabeling, mis-informing, & outright lying about the risks of variable-rate mortages (ARM)

    Just b/c there is potential for abuse, does not mean it’s condoned. Or are Free-Traders saying we need even more explicit laws? More detailed.. um, “Adult Supervision“?(?!)

    So the question remains:
    “Does the ‘Free Market’ really work?” ie, are these kinds of excesses & damage ‘normal’ & acceptable? That would be the logical outcome of ‘Free Market’ thinking… but I can’t find a Free Marketer who will admit that… and Greenspan just admitted quite the opposite. Really, it’s one thing to have ‘pure philosophical ideals’, & quite another to watch as economic tragedy cuts a huge swath across your Country.

    And if Free Marketers are thus admitting, “these kinds of things happen… but the Market corrects for them (eventually)”…
    …while -also- saying “this shouldn’t have happened”…

    …then basically what they’re saying is, “We Need Regulation”.

    So much for “Free Market” philosophy…

    It, just like the (small) minority who act unethically, Can’t Be Trusted.

    Repub ‘talking points’ & Intellectual Violence…

    Thursday, December 4th, 2008

    Has this ever happened to you?
    You’re ‘discussing’ politics with someone of the ‘opposite persuasion’, & some (or all) of the following comes-up:

  • Bush isn’t a ‘true’ Conservative -or- Repub
    -so any (alleged) failures by him, aren’t indictments of Repubs, let-alone ‘Conservatives’
  • Obama is
    -”unknown”
    -”liar”
    -”unqualified”
    -really did “pal around w/ terrorists”
    -caused stock-market crash; the Market simply reacted in fear that he’d win
  • McCain is
    -a Liberal
    -a “Traitor” (Rush’s favorite line)
  • Clinton ruined everything
    -ruined the economy
    -hugely expanded gov’t, with massive give-aways to baby-boomer/ 60′s counterculture (ie ‘socialist’) Programs
    -deregulated housing market & created the bubble
    -never went after terrorism
    -downgraded the military
    -accelerated failure of marriage -&-
    -”made a mockery of the Presidency”
    -”lied to Congress (about sex)… which is (technically) much more important than lying to American Public about WMD”
  • Reagan was faultless, indefectible, sublime…
    -everything was perfect
    -”deficits don’t matter”
    -eliminated recession
    -’gave us’ the best US economy & taxpayer/citizen wealth in 30+ years
  • Palin is awesome
    -she is/was prepared; much more than a ‘Community Organizer’
    -MSM edited her interviews to make her look bad
    -Biden is waaay more gaffe-ridden & dangerous
  • Iraq invasion was Great
    -diplomacy is weakness; ‘big stick’ is best
    -there really were WMD there, -&-
    -however well the surge worked, 4yrs in, justifies our Presence there
  • lower taxes for rich help all of us
    -stimulate economy
    -gov’t would just waste it anyway
  • Katrina is not US Gov’ts fault
    -Natural Disasters are states’ responsibility
    -Louisiana’s Governor & New Orleans’ Mayor screwed it all up, not FEMA
  • Mainstream Media (MSM) is:
    -always lying & censoring the real truth (ie, Rush, O’Reilly, Hannity, etc)
    -always Liberal, with unquestionably massive bias
    -basically stupid, de facto traitors/etc aligned with ‘our enemies’

    …& then my two ‘Favorites’:

  • Gov’t doesn’t work
    -all Gov’t failures are expected
    -Dems create more damage than repubs, are more corrupt & misguided, nottomention are all creeping Socialists/Liberal/(read: “Traitor”)/etc
    -deficits/Federal-Debt doesn’t matter — China will be happy to keep funding it, forever
    -Repubs & Conservatives are more honest, morally, ethically, fundamentally

    -& best-

  • All Politicians are liars
    -Dems & Repubs are ‘pretty-much the same’, & therefore-
    -Dems are (morally) culpable for everything Repubs (allegedly) did, b/c “they did it too, & it’ll get exposed eventually”
  • .
    So… any of this sound familiar?
    This is quite the impressive list… from ‘lightly-twisted’ interpretations of history, to outright lies… this combination of ‘talking points’ isn’t just airtight, it’s hermetically sealed.
    Nothing can penetrate this set of statements; the person (spewing) this isn’t just “well-prepared”, they’re utterly walled-off from any possible other input.
    Ladies & Gentlemen– this is called Message Discipline via doctrinal repetition, confirmation bias, & ad-hominem attack.

    Let me break-down the Repub/Conservative ‘Debate Process’:
    1) State talking-point, w/ utter confidence & authority as if it’s a-priori & beyond doubt
    2. Freely attack the personal character of not just Obama/Bill Clinton/et al, but of yours as well, for (daring) to defend them, -& always-
    3. Escalate emotion, as follows:
    (a) Their positions/statements are true, logical, & self-evident; how (dare) you question them(?!)
    (b) Claim they’re being misunderstood, mis-represented, &/or (even) victimized, if/when you respond in kind… -& then-
    (c) Outright blame you for being emotional, disingenuous, unreasonable, illogical, & ill-informed. Ie, classical projection… or rather, ‘accuse you before you can accuse them’; ie, “tap-tap no tag-backs!”.

    Rinse & repeat.

    …& what’s amazing, is I thought this would all be done after Nov 4th.
    After eight (8?!!) years of high-crimes, misdemeanors, & outright ineptness, we now can start to rebuild, right? And the repubs/conservatives[sic] will fall-back & regroup?

    Don’t you believe it– for whatever reason, Rush et al appear to be on the offensive even worse, & his DittoHeads are still going-strong… but, um, with the same talking-points from last month(?!) Earth to Rush– the Election already happened, & you lost. NO, it wasn’t some great MSM conspiracy, ‘massive voter fraud’, & NO “Fair Use” isn’t going to pull you & your wingnut brethern off the air… And yet you still persist in this nonsense.

    So it’s good for us Dems/Progressives/Liberals to be prepared: next time this happens to you, next time you get caught-up in this sequence, just stop in your tracks, disengage, & walk away.

    Why? Isn’t that ‘giving-up’? Don’t we have a (responsibility) to point-out when ppl are being lead-astray, by [fat, oxycontin-guzzling, rabble-rousing, incredibly hypocritical, smooth-talking, etcetc] unrepentant liars?

    No. Because there’s no reasoning w/ someone who thinks like this:

    1. they don’t consider this a ‘discussion’, an opportunity to trade ideas & explore different points of view;
    2. this is simply another venue for a (repub/conservative) to follow their Process, & beat-down their Opposition….
    3. By any means necessary.

      …& we Dems/Liberals/Progressives are typically Suckers for this, b/c in general–

    4. we try to Listen
    5. we try to give them the Benefit of the Doubt
    6. we (assume) the other guy/gal respects our position, or at least the possibility that we have a (valid) position

    .
    Look– it’s really simple:

  • Truths must be falsible, else they’re Beliefs.
  • But Beliefs aren’t logical; they’re simply tightly-held, despite all evidence to the contrary.

    …& anybody espousing any of the Talking Points above is coming-from Belief, rather than Fact, no matter how vociferously they spin it.

    And so next time this happens, give-up trying to find “common ground”, let-alone getting them to ‘agree’ w/ any of your points…
    …& for that matter, you might as well give-up spending any time at all ‘considering’ the Talking Points listed above… all of them have been thoroughly refuted, and to spend any time at all (re)reviewing them is just to play into their Game… & thereby erode your own confidence.

    Just. Walk. Away.
    or, if you will:
    Don’t Feed the Trolls…

    .
    FWIW– There’s a word for people who attack violently, unethically, immorally, & would rather (die) than admit defeat. They’re called “terrorists”;
    And this kind of verbal attacking, this flagrant intellectual dishonesty & willingness to stop at nothing to ‘win’, is basically “intellectual violence”.

    And the Repubs/Conservatives are extremely skilled at it… B/c God knows that’s the closest Bush, Cheney, Wolfowitz, Rummsfield, Palin… let-alone Rush, O’Reilly, Hannity, Coulter et al ever got to actually taking up a weapon & defending our Country… They’d just rather brutally slander real war heroes like Murtha, Kerry, & Max Cleland.

    I gots your #, bitches.

  • The Death of the ‘Permanent Republican Majority’

    Wednesday, November 5th, 2008

    …& I couldn’t be more ecstatic.

    It’s like a wet dream– could Washington, one day soon, actually start operating from Policy & Governance?
    Actual enforcement of the Law of the Land, ie the Constitution?!!
    And, dare we hope, inspirational Leadership?????

    …You mean, “West Wing” wasn’t some kind of hippy ‘limousine liberal’ fantasy…
    …You mean, we could actually see intelligent, patriotic, hard-working officials dedicated to making our Government workFor the People, By the People?!!!

    …You mean, after eight (8) long years…:

  • No more Signing Statements, undermining Constitutional Checks & Balances
  • No more blurring of Church & State… ie governance by ‘Social Conservatives’ [read: Born-Again & Moral-Majority] who never Discuss but always Condemn
  • No more ‘Compassionate Conservatives’ who are anything but compassionate -or- conservative
  • No more headlong increase in the Federal Debt
  • No more “Reagan proved that deficits don’t matter”
  • No more political appointments & sinecures to important policy posts, of completely unqualified personnel
  • No more gridlocked Congress, Republican ‘Nuclear Option’, &/or continuous fillibustering (on-target to exceed 3x more fillibusters this Congressional session, as were ever before).
  • No more ‘Reverse Robin-Hood’ tax-cuts for the rich
  • No more gutting the EPA
  • No more gutting the Consumer Product Safety Commission
  • No more ‘privatizing’ national resources
  • No more ‘no-bid’ sweetheart contracts to Halliburton/etc
  • No more ‘Go-it-Alone’ strategy on the world stage
  • No more hostility to the United Nations
  • No more “Bring it On” war-mongering
  • No more blowing-off the Kyoto Accord
  • No more Children Left Behind… & actually fund better schools, teachers, and Student Outreach this time…
  • No more mad dash to drill everywhere & start building nuclear power plants (oh sure they’re “carbon neutral”[sic]… they’ve just that teensy 1,000yr+ 1/2-life toxic waste disposal problem…)
  • No more blatant, outright lying by an Entitled Ruling Party who utterly disrespects & disregards anyone who isn’t a “Have-More”
  • No more Executive ‘Culture of Cynical Bungling’
  • No more ‘vp’ who “isn’t part of the Executive Branch”[sic]
  • No more ‘Decider’ who “goes by his gut”
  • And Most-Importantly–

  • No more Social-Conservative, Pro-Big-Business/Anti-Worker’s-Rights Activists on the Supreme Court.
  • Praise the Lord…

    ‘Still-Bush’ at the ‘Sporting Event’

    Tuesday, August 12th, 2008

    Dude. All he needed was the beer-bong hat, cocaine pipe, & draft deferral in his paw, & he’d be back in college (getting a C+).

    I am soooo wasted!
    “I am sooo wasted!”

    Oh man, Condi’s just gotta get me one of these!
    “Oh man, Condi’s just gotta get me one of these!”

    Practicing my ‘Cheney look’
    “Practicing my ‘Cheney look’… bet he’d love to shoot him a Panda… in the face!” :-)

    Heheheh. I could totally tap that, & they’d *still* blame Clinton!
    “Heheheh. I could totally tap that, & they’d still blame Clinton!” :-D

    NYT – Sandra Day O’Connor’s Plan for Joystick Justice

    Thursday, June 5th, 2008

    Can you believe this?!

    Great. She quit the Supremes two full years early for THIS?! Does she really think that making some (guaranteed gawdawful) ‘edutainment’ software will create a huge giant wave of civic understanding, let-alone civic involvement?

    Here’s a thought– why not leverage what works. For example, make an Extension Pack on top of a currently highly-successful game, such as GTA4 (Grand Theft Auto IV) or WoW (World of Warcraft), with little SIM-like bubbles popping-up listing all the Federal & Civic codes being violated as you tool around, killing things. Fun -and- Enlightening!

    Geeze Ms O’Connor– you really want all your ex-brethren Supremes to be household names like Simon & Paula? THEY WILL– just as soon as they complete their dismantling of Roe-v-Wade. When the hoi polloi wake up & realize that the USA has just become the only “First World Nation” in which it is illegal to have an abortion, and they they have absolutely no say in the matter, the hue & outcry will be epic. Because, despite all neo-con arguments to the contrary, “Roe v. Wade did not mean that abortions could be performed. They have always been done, dating from ancient Greek days”, WALDO L. FIELDING, M.D.

    Dare we say “Impeach”– both Roberts & Alito -swore- to Congress that they were “strict Constructionists”… but it turns-out that 30yrs of Roe-v-Wade precept isn’t enough. Heck, O’Connor might actually be alive to watch -all- of her previous ‘swing-vote’ decisions be dismantled.

    God.Help.Us.All.

    How can you be against “Health Care for Children”

    Friday, October 5th, 2007

    HTF can you be against health-care for children?
    …isn’t that the first rule politicians learn: nestle-up to vets & kiss the babies?
    Why not say “fuck mom & I hate apple pie”?!!

    …All those childhood years of hearing about Marie Antoinette, about how her basic obliviousness was part-&-parcel of the utter cluelessness of the French Ruling Class… how her words were totemic in galvanizing the French Revolution. And most of all, how she deserved whatever she (& the Aristocracy) got (ie, their heads separated from their necks).

    But I ask you– when somebody has no health insurance; has no ability to get to a doctor; (barely) able to get to an Emergency Room; to then wait for literally dozens of hours to be seen by harried, overworked ER doctors who are trained to deal with major trauma victims first & foremost… And then finally to almost certainly default on payment for the (understandably) premium-price that is charged by ER’s… (they are for “emergencies”, not for ‘normal medical care’; it’s in their very name!)

    …And yet Bush says: “I mean, people have access to health care in America,” he said. “After all, you just go to an emergency room.” link
    Or how about when he said last week, “they don’t need Government Health Care; they can just ask their doctor”.

    I ask you– doesn’t that sound a bit familiar?
    Someone else who has absolutely no clue about whom they were talking about? Someone born w/ a silver spoon so far down their throats they simply couldn’t conceive of lacking basic sustenance; the question was never “eat or go hungry”, but rather “eat lobster or go eat steak”:

    “Why do they need bread? Let them eat cake”

    …I wonder– As Euripides said, “Those whom the gods wish to destroy they first make mad”. Could this be, at the very last, a chance for the Dems to override a Presidential veto?????

    If that happens, that will open the floodgates… if at first a trickle, before the roar:

  • Accountability for Katrina
  • Accountability for Federal Debt
  • Accountability for Social Security lockbox raiding, -& even-
  • Accountability for Iraq
  • We can only hope.

    ‘Activist Judges’, indeed…

    Friday, April 20th, 2007

    So have you heard about the US Supreme Court ruling on weds?
    …Exactly as predicted w/ the promotion of Alito & Roberts last year, the first major decision(s) of the new Court are directly targeting abortion. This ruling represents the first major threat against “Roe vs Wade” in 30+ years. And at this rate, with the neocon’s new solid majority on the Court (with current members Scalia & Thomas eagerly stating for the record “we think abortion should be outlawed”)… it’s not inconceivable that within the next few years or so, the USA will gain the distinction of being the only 1st-world nation which outlaws abortion.

    How could this happen? The US Government is not the Taliban, right? We’re a non-radical, educated, informed country… whose women have been equal in ‘the eyes of the law’ for so long, it’s not worth mentioning (or even on the radar of young feminists). So how could 33yr-old precedent-setting “Roe v. Wade” suddenly be under attack?

    Ah, but let’s take a walk back to Jr. High Civics class… Despite the high-visibility of the Presidential role, or the loud brouhaha of the legislative process in Congress… these 9 old, mostly under-the-radar ‘Justices’[sic] are fully equal in power to Congress, or the President himself. It’s right there in the Constitution– Congress makes laws, Pres signs/enforce them (or not, as we’ve been seeing for the last 7yrs), & the Court decides if those laws or enforcings are “Constitutional” or not. That’s Power. But you know what’s even more powerful? These 9 ppl DO NOT EVER LEAVE, UNTIL THEY DIE. The most we can be stuck w/ an awful, misrepresenting Pres is 8yrs, or Congressperson 4yrs. But chances are, like the Pope, we’ll be stuck w/ the current crop of Supremes for the next 20yrs or so… esp. these two new, ‘stealth neocon’ appointments.

    So what’s all the fuss w/ this new Ruling, anyway? Well, they just upheld a state’s right to ban ‘partial-birth abortion’… ie, D&C past the 1st trimester. “And what’s that?” you ask… Well, specific medical techniques aside, ‘partial-birth abortion’[sic] has long been rigged as a ‘wedge-issue’ to start dismantling the basic legality of abortion; specifically, the main rationale, ie. abortion is under a woman’s “right to privacy”. By reframing abortion into “viability of a child” rather than “woman’s right to privacy” (let-alone “viability of partially-developed, non-thinking protoplasm”), the neocons & born-agains are rabble-rousing. Why call a woman “independent” & “maker of a very difficult choice”, when you can call her “baby-killer”?

    To think that this could happen in a Country long self-proclaimed as “The Land of the Free”…. Well, you must remember that this same country has actually been presided-over by Republicans for 19 of the last 27 years(?)… & they’ve finally got their payoff: a solid neocon majority in the Supreme Court.

    The most appalling feature of the neocon movement is its unabashed hypocrisy– they have zero hesitation proscribing moral rulings over ‘the common people’, which they themselves casually ignore. From sending the historically least amount of its sons to war, to eagerly plundering the common reserves, the average neocon acts like Raskolnikov of “Crime & Punishment” (or the ‘bad guys’ in “Knight Rider”): they’re Above the Law, judicially as well as morally.

    Or in other words, when the Bushie girls have their statistically predicable mishap w/ a condom & their lunar cycle, the Bushies will pack them up on Air Force One & fly them over to Dubai or somewhere where they can have world-class medical care, pre & post-op, for their very own abortion(s). Laws, morals, money, service-to-country, abstinence… these are only ‘talking points’ for stump speeches, nicely spun by H-wood writers & pumped-up w/ strongly-framed rhetoric by Rove. Because if you think Bush & cohort truly actually believe the neocon fundamentalism they outwardly espouse, perhaps you haven’t been paying attention.

    PS– Oh, & about that “Activist Judges” tag… funny how, after literally years of whining, ranting, & otherwise dirty politic’ing, labelling each & every Court decision they didn’t like as “Activist Judging”… it’s just friggin’ hilarious how the NeoCons leap at the opportunity to do a little ‘Activist Judging’ themselves. Creating ‘Policy’ from the Bench, hmm? Nothing like THIRTY FULL YEARS OF JUDICIAL PRECEPT to set the “Law of the Land”, you-know? Nah, let’s just toss that out, as soon as we have a Majority. I just hope to see these NeoCons hoist on their own petard… it doesn’t take too much to get them all attacking each other. Picture this: the Supremes pulling the plug on all ‘Right to Privacy’, & so the respective states start pushing mandatory drug screening… for everyone. Quaking now, Pill Poppin’ Rush.L?

    It must be fun to be invincibly ignorant…

    Thursday, April 6th, 2006

    …I mean, you can pride yourself as ‘Contrarian’ (or even ‘politically-incorrect‘)

    …you never have to have any pesky doubts as to who’s ‘Right’ or not

    …you have an enormous array of put-downs handily available, carefully formulated by likeminded, similarly funded old white-guy writers… (oh wait, Coulter’s not a guy :-) ) for personally attacking anyone wrong-headed enough to take a position even slightly differing from yours

    …& you get to hear exactly the same sentiments you espouse, over & over & over in the right-wing echo-chamber you’ve successfully framed as ‘The Liberal media’. “Fair & Balanced”, anyone?

    So I’m just wondering– we know many of the most invincibly ignorant NeoCons actually are highly-funded, highly-educated Professor types, who hang-out in famous Ivy League schools with fully-funded Big Business Endowed Chairs. Great gig if you can get it, right? But they usually generate a continuous output of erudite publications known for their highly rigorous, highly-logical thinking

    But WHAMMO– all that comes to a screeching halt, when it comes time to toe the ‘Party-Line’.

    How must it feel, what is the taste in their mouths, when they have to say things like “Creationism is science”, or “Global Warming doesn’t exist”(?!) For God’s sake [whichever 'one' or 'many' you choose], this is the 20th year in a row of steadily rising Earth temperatures, steadily shrinking icecaps, dramatically increased weather-related & otherwise natural disasters, & now even South Pole polar bears are dying in dramatic numbers b/c there aren’t enough icebergs for them to float on.

    But no, “global warming doesn’t exist”… or still better, burning fossil fuels is the ‘best source of energy’, b/c:

    “we can do more to help the poor by combating these problems now than we would by reducing carbon dioxide emissions…. Moreover, it is acknowledged by every responsible economist that drastic action to reduce fossil fuel use would increase energy costs, which would in turn reduce household income. Wealthier is healthier, and richer is cleaner.” National Review

    Stop right there. That’s pure obfuscation, albeit elegantly framed. You see, rather than attacking head-on the concept of Global Warming (b/c there’s just too many Nobel Laureates saying it exists to undercut, discredit or successfully call ‘liberal loonies’, dagnabbit), why not just damn the concept of “Global Warming” with faint praise, & then ridicule any/all attempts made to actually address it. “Responsibility”, indeed. How does the party of ‘Moral Majority’ possibly justify bankrupting our future, exhausting our national resources, and rolling-back pollution controls (called the “Clean Air Act”, how Orwellian).

    And here’s an even more brilliant straw dog– raise the idea of “helping the poor”, & then never actually do anything to help them… Heck, they should just ‘work harder’, to be a ‘have-more’ too, right? Where’s their ‘discipline‘?!

    Or wait– I’ve got it: let’s do the reverse: not just ‘promising & then not paying’ (like say, New Orleans), or “spend but not tax”, or even calling any non-have-more’s “a nation of whiners“… Let’s actually roll-thru a whole new array of nation-wide social service cuts, this past Congress Session. Fantastic!

    Anything is okay, I guess, to ensure continued massive consumption of fossil fuels… we wouldn’t want to ‘hurt the economy’, would we? And I suppose that same ‘economy’ will operate just fine, when the seas have risen enough to bury New York like Katrina did New Orleans? (Scientists estimate that will take approx. 60years at current rate of global icecap shrinkage… & correspondingly, very little time to reverse Global Warming’s acceleration.) Sorry kids… Heck, only liberals live in NY; good riddance.

    So again, what must it be like, to be a fat, wealthy, old white man… surrounded by skads of same, convinced all “good” & “right” ppl go to your same (“One True”TM) church, worshiping the same (“One True”TM) God, & feeding at the troughs of the Born-Again/NeoCon deep-pocket backers. Never a pesky doubt, never a chance missed to wrap yourself in flag-pin patriotism, paying lip-service to “our boys” while cutting their VA benefits & awarding yourselves yet another huge tax cut.

    Don’t worry– none of ‘their boys’ are ‘over there’; their boys are busily finishing Harvard MBA’s, JD’s, & assorted other ‘fast-track’ paths to inherit (or at least leverage) daddy’s billions. B/c here’s the dirty little secret of the “have-more’s”: the vast majority of them in America didn’t “pull themselves up by their bootstraps”; they inherited (ever wonder why they campaigned for so long & so vociferously against the ‘Death‘ Inheritance Tax, mmm?)

    So just How do these guys do it? How could any thinking, caring person do something like this? Don’t they have kids, who’ll have to grow-up in an increasingly polluted, increasingly bankrupt, increasingly lower-class American world-standing???

    Easy. Rent All the President’s Men. Hear the immortal words, “follow the money”. And then take another look at the entire NeoCon agenda… from war “Police Actions” in Iraq to South America; to attacking tort law (hey, eliminating big pay-outs for class-action lawsuits both protects large corporations, and simultaneously defunds tort lawyers, who are predominantly Democrat); to rolling-back Clean-Air Act & drilling in ANWR… it’s all about the $$.

    Watch their actions, not their words. They’ll say ‘morals’, & ‘discipline’ (fiscal & otherwise), & then vote themselves another tax-cut, open another dozen off-shore tax-shelter loopholes, or even better: raise the debt ceiling to $9 Trillion (edit: $TEN TRILLION?!!!!). Can we just stop saying “deficit spending” & say “the Federal Gov’t is broke”?

    Never forget, Bush once greeted a room of these guys thusly:
    “This is an impressive crowd: the Have’s and the Have-More’s. Some people call you the elite, I call you my base” Al Smith Dinner Speech.

    It must be fun, knowing that your are Right & there will never be a ‘Piper to Pay’.

    God[sic] help us all.