Posts Tagged ‘film-making’

Shoot for a Living…(?)

Friday, June 23rd, 2006

Wow!

It’s been far too long since I’ve last shot a production, lemme tell you.

So, I’m just back from shooting a live concert, my first in months (at The Avalon w/ an HVX200 in DV50 mode & 2x 8GB P2′s… Yeah!)… And I hadn’t realized just how much I’d missed shooting.

So why’s that? Turns-out, shooting touches-on a terrific constellation of skills–

  • creative: where are you gonna point the camera
  • analytical: how do you maximize your effectiveness on-set
  • leadership: how do you get everyone pointing in the same direction
  • communicative: how do you get the picture across w/ a minimum of confusion
  • intuitive: how do you ‘fix’ stuff that could/just/might-happen, before it happens?

-and-

  • kinesthetic: how do you schlepp all that gear, then shoot all those hours, & not be bed-ridden for a week? :-)

…& then when you’re done, w/ any luck, you’ve got something that looks cool, & entertains (& maybe even inspires) others.

Ah yes… so someone remind me why I schlepp code for a ‘living’, again?

Why is “Galactica” sucking so bad??

Tuesday, May 16th, 2006

hey– why is Galactica sucking so bad? they even pulled the “Alias
Error”: Season Finale– “…One Year Later…”, ie. completely jettisoning the previous plotlines, not to mention character development (love that the ‘nice sweet schoolteacher’ has become a ice-cold “throw ‘em out the airlock” b*tch. Nice move there for a ‘prophet’).

The miniseries was so incredible.. & now each character is in a rut, & the only ‘humanity’ anyone is displaying is by those 2 Cylons (but they’re hot… hmmm).

I suppose i can stand the character inconsistencies,
fragmented/discarded storylines, low-tek special effects (hey Zoic: low-res cgi shaky-cam & cheesy models looked really cool in ‘Firefly’… b/c the show’s entire look was low-rent & cheesy– the frickin ship was supposed to look like ass! But here in ‘full-on polyester uniform’ville of Galactica, those super-saturated & blown-out crispy digital effects just look like bad circa-80′s Video Toaster)…

…or how about the utterly underutilized character-actor cameos, such as Bill Duke & Dean Stockwell. This is unconscionable– just watch “Predator” (the Sarge) or “Blue Velvet” to see what those two gentlemen in particular can do, when given great scripts & excellent direction. Instead, they’re brought-in, get to ham it up a little, & are then summararily blown-away. You got these guys to play throw-away parts in throw-away plotlines? What were you thinking?!! Just think of Bill Duke as a Cylon overlord… or Dean Stockwell as a mad prophet whose madness eerily parallels the Prez’s. These would be memes that resonated across the entire series, let-alone multiple episodes. Instead, each are whacked, & even that is poorly-written. Consider: a den of thieves, hardened criminals loyal to their boss, & they get cowed by Daddy’s Boy ships away from his backup? Are you kidding me?? Or better– let’s casually destroy the balanced characterization of the prez, & make her a cold-ass killer by whacking Stockwell… w/o even grilling him for information!What a waste.

…or how about all the deus-ex machina’s? Poof, exeunt prez’s cancer. Poof, let’s find habital planets (& worlds chock-full of tillium), just when we need them! Er, I suppose the writers don’t read their own previous scripts, eg. when both habital planets & tillium reserves were described by Adama as “extremely rare… like a needle in a haystack”… & Tie grunts “like a needle on a beach”. I guess it was a beach of needles…

But anyway– I’ll let all that go, or try to… but how about all the huge technical oversights? Excuse me– isn’t this a frickin’ science-fiction series???? Can’t they even get the geeky bits right? Do they think their core demo (dorky, bespectacled geeks w/ photographic memories for myriad, inchoate, parsnickity details) won’t miss a little something like: HOW THE FUCK CAN A BRAND-NEW BATTLESTAR & VIPERS MANAGE TO NOT GET INFECTED BY CYLON VIRII?!!! Especially when every other one was waxed w/in 1hr at the start of the war?! Has anyone ever ‘explained’ that? Don’t tell me “Pegasus” doesn’t have huge networked computers; their control room is like 1/10 the size of Galactica’s. ARRRRGGGH!!!
Let’s imagine The Writers: “Er, um, look-away, look-away; let’s have Starbuck screw-around & get drunk again.” (Which, as a friend pointed out to me, is quite an effective plot-device. But anyway…)
On a more positive note, Number Six has posed naked all over the web, which is very good advertising. Remind me, when i Run a Show, to cast hot ladies willing to get naked. It’s called “Production Value” :-P

I think my v. fave sci-fi ever is “Firefly”. Get the dvd’s from Netflix,
& watch in the correct order (ie, not the Fox-broadcasted mis-order)… Because: “Joss Whedon Knows Character Development”… & he even includes his obligatory “Hot Teen with Superpowers”(TM).

I’m not a rabid fan, ‘browncoat’ or whatever… but I’ve seen the series 3 times now (the film ‘Serenity’ is not that great), & still like it… whereas i don’t ever plan to watch Galactica again.

What a shame… all those Wasted Opportunities… all those wasted dvd-r blanks…

List for 2005

Sunday, January 1st, 2006

Everyone’s gotta list of “Most”‘s to close-off the year, so here’s mine:

Most Best’est:
“The Constant Gardener” (& best proof “City of God” wasn’t a fluke)
– a real ‘thinking-man’s adventure’: taut, exciting, & endlessly surprising… even though you knew the end the minute it started -and-
– better still– it’s a love story, between mature adults, & ‘lo isn’t that a subversive move in this age of “Titanic” & “Nemo”
– & yet– I’m betting it will be completely ignored at Oscar time. Even the great William Goldman swore twenty yrs ago, “the only adventure the Academy will ever award would probably be a ‘medical’ adventure”… but here it is, & the Academy would much rather feed “Stephen fake-sentimentality Spielburg” one more statue. Every vote they give him assuages their guilt for the mountains of soulless crap they spew…. to everyone else I say– watch “The Constant Gardener”, & then “City of God”… & then try to tell me “nobody’s making good films anymore”. These are no ‘foreign, art-house’ subtitle-afflicted slow-paced mental masturbations– these are simply fantastic films.

Most Disappointing:
“Sin City”
– kudos to Rodriguez for making HD look much better than the ballyhoo’d Episodes 1-3… -&-
– kudos for standing up to the stupid DGA who said the Writer couldn’t be a Co-Director, -but-
no thanks for making a real mess of what’s actually one of the better retellings of Mickey Spillane, Frank Miller’s “Sin City 1: The Tale of Marv”. Marv is the fantastic underhero, drawn like Batman, with the fists of a brawler & a heart of gold. He truly feels for Goldie, but neither Rodriguez nor Miller [trusted] their audience enough to rein-in a few ‘bullets/blood/broads’ shots & let Marv have his Hamlet moment(s). I highly recommend the graphic novel, or read some early Spillane instead.

“Syriana”
– kudos for ‘trying’ to make a Big Movie about Big Ideas, political ideas, & still make it interesting if not balanced (“Faranheit 9/11″ embarrassed me & I’m really liberal), -but-
– couldn’t they have made a film that made any sense? This film’s story was tangled, confused & disconnected, ultimately making the characters unsympathetic, their actions arbitrary, if not ultimately unmemorable
– if you want a ‘movie that make you go hmmm’ & yet a joy to watch, try “The Player”, a masterpiece (everything about Hollywood filmmaking you’d ever need to know, & infinitely better than “Adaptation”‘s turgid confusion). And if you want ‘political thriller’, just watch “Constant Gardener”

Most ‘Almost’:
“History of Violence”
– This film is pretty good, & even ‘very good’ if you consider David “Videodrome” Cronenberg was at the helm. He deserves a big box-office film; he should have won a stack of awards for “Dead Ringers” -but-
ouch that was a terrible title, almost as bad as “Constant Gardener”. Did anybody know what the film was about, before they went? Even the commercials were confused… :-) -nevertheless-
– the climax of the film, the face-off with Hurt, was too pat. Whereas the previous face-off w/ Ed Harris was pure tension, dramatic angles, & painfully extracted glimmers of back-story… the ‘ultimate confrontation’ between finally-reuinited brothers basically devolved to Hurt strutting around, phoning in the same hammed-up wooden face he perfected in “Network”, while Viggo.M’s not-so-great killing moves weren’t very well protected by the camera. We weren’t shocked, we weren’t surprised, we didn’t learn much, & it was kinda hard to care… so we’re left waiting for a ‘big finish’… which never happens. And yet the ‘negative capability’ of the final scene really would have been sublime, if it had followed a climax as well-drawn as the Viggo-vs-Harris confrontation. William Hurt can act better than this. Too bad.
– But gotta love that stairway scene… the perfect balance to the cheerleader scene. Older ppl can have sexy and mature relationships too! Thank bog for Cronenberg (& Fernando “Pregnant women are sexy” Meirelles)

-and- The Most Fun:
Seeing my short film at the “Shorts Project”, live on-stage amidst some great plays by Steve Martin & Don Niegro, for three weeks in front of paying audiences. We even got great reviews from SF Bay Guardian & SF Weekly!
You can see it too, here.

See you at the ‘Netflix :-P

dreaming of Stallone

Wednesday, November 9th, 2005

okay, last nite i had a dream with Sly. He’s sitting at a bar with some impossibly-tall blonde, & I’m some distance away, talking smack about him to a friend I’m with. About how horrible an actor, director, etc. he is… & that if he really wrote “Rocky”, why hasn’t he found (let-alone written) anything watchable since. Rather boring, booze-filled monologue, really.

But then there’s one of those epic silences you find in bars sometimes, & suddenly my voice isn’t so hushed by crowd walla anymore. & I look up, & Stallone is staring at me… w/ tears filling his eyes. & I suddenly feel ashamed.

For the life of me, I don’t know why.

Does this make me:
a) a terrific Producer (ie, knowing what & on whom to not waste $$),
b) a terrible Director (making an ‘action character’ cry spells putrid box-office), -or-
c) frickin’ deranged & in desperate need of revising my ‘meds.

I’m just asking.

Whoops! Sorry for the delay…

Friday, November 4th, 2005

…it’s just i’ve been busily hacking-away on this silent short for the LVE Shorts Project. It’s called “Stuck in Mom’s Dream”, & you can check it out here.

The actors were terrific, & had quite a blast playing with the roles. The more I do this ‘filmmaking’ thing, the more impressed I am with what everyone brings to the table. Any writer/director who ignores their actors’ impressions/thoughts/feelings about their roles will just never get the superlative performance, i’m learning…

anyway, pls forgive me. I’ll have more wip clips up soon.

it begins…

Tuesday, August 2nd, 2005

hey everyone.
i welcome you to cruise by occasionally & check-out:
- production methodologies,
- editing tips/tricks,
- camera fundamentals,
- set etiquette,
- acting for camera, -and-
- the Director’s Eye

…& i’m sure some “notes on leadership” will pop-in somewhere, b/c i’m a global manager in my day-job… :-P