Posts Tagged ‘camera’

Getting the Best out of your DSLR

Sunday, September 18th, 2011

Here’s some Tips/Tricks I’ve found that help me get good imagery.
I’ve fielded enough “how do you get shots like that” questions, I figured I’d write it up… Enjoy!

Tip/Trick #1: keeping the camera on ‘P’/”Program” mode effectively turns your expensive DSLR into a really expensive & awkward ‘point&shoot’.

    o P/Program Mode is basically ‘safe’ mode, & you will typically get decent, run-of-the-mill shots… -BUT-
    o If you want to get very nice shots, it’s important to start turning off the various ‘Auto’ modes, so you create (much) more control over what the camera is shooting. See Below…

Tip/Trick #2: If you want really nice shots, it’s important to:

    o Shoot a Lot! -AND-
    o Review your shots, taking note of what you did: Aperture, Shutterspeed, ISO/gain, WB (white-balance: eg Auto, Sun, Incandescent, etc), etc
    o Take notes to yourself (you might even reference the photo filename &/or day), so that you can compare/contrast, & watch/confirm your progress over time. It really works!

Tip/Trick #3: It’s better to Get an ‘imperfect’ Shot, than futzing around for a ‘perfect’ shot than you never manage to take…

    o Whatever camera you have handy, is better than the camera you have at home!! Ideally, get a top point/shoot like the S95 or S100: pocket-size, f/2.0, full manual control, & RAW…
    o LEARN YOUR CAMERA!! Messing with the dials/menus & missing the shot isn’t worth it, & will just frustrate you enough to ‘not bother’…
    o “Don’t Worry, you can Fix Some Stuff in Post“: Photoshop is your friend—there’s a lot of stuff you can do to fix things afterwards (composure, exposure, color-balance, even some focus problems)… but not if you don’t have some sort of shot to work with…

BASIC SETTINGS to Maximize Picture-Quality:

“Av” Mode: Aperture Priority: I highly-recommend this mode. It’s usually best to open the aperture to maximum, as often as you can. This does the following:

    o Increases your shutter-speed (makes the number smaller: eg 1/250, 1/500, 1/1,000, etc). This makes it easier to stop motion, to avoid blurry running children, etc),
    o Shortens your depth-of-field (helping create a blurry background, ie ‘bokeh‘ which is optimal for ‘portraiture’, & instantly increases the ‘production value’ of your shot).
    o Note: in a regular zoom, the aperture ‘ramps’ as you go from wide to long. So, set Av mode, go wide on the lens, & then set the aperture wide-open. The aperture will ramp down (number goes larger as lens stops down) as you zoom-out, but the aperture will also ramp up as you zoom wide again. If you set the aperture when you are zoomed-in, the aperture sometimes won’t decrease (lens stops open) when you zoom-out/go-wide.
    o The only time you need to stop-down the lens (close-down the aperture, ie increase the f-number, ie f/8, f/11, f/22, etc), is if:
    § You really want everything to be in focus , foreground & background
    § You’re shooting in very bright sunlight, & even with the ISO at 100 or lower, the exposure is too much for the shutter (eg, the shutter is 1/10,000+)
    o There’s no real need to worry that “max wide-open creates optical artifacts”: that’s true for professional photographers who’re going to be blowing-up the image 4’ wide or printing in a magazine. Unless you’re doing that, wide-open lenses are just fine. If you’re really worried, click one stop from fully-wide, & you’ll be great.

ISO/ASA (really: ‘digital gain’): Most good DSLR’s (Canon, Nikon, etc) will shoot extremely clean photos at ISO 400, or even 800. Above that, you start getting what looks like ‘grain’, & sometimes a bit of color fringing. Test! Or look at comparison-charts on the-digital-picture.com for your camera & lens.

    o Note: It’s important to actually choose an ISO. if you set ‘Auto’, then even if you’re in ‘Av’ mode, the camera will variously (randomly?) adjust both ISO & shutter, which can alternately give you ‘digital grain’ or low gain & long shutter, letting the shot blur(!)
    o So it’s much better to set an ISO, be in Av mode, & let the camera choose the shutterspeed for you.

Shutterspeed: Try to be at least 1/125 or ideally 1/250 to stop fast motion. Or in other words, stop your lens wide-open, & adjust your ISO until you get the shutterspeed you want for that shot.

    o (you can ½-click the shutter-release, & look in the viewfinder… or just shoot a test shot to see what the camera thinks is the right shutterspeed).
    o I hardly use Tv (shutter-priority) mode, unless I want to blur motion, eg waterfalls or waves at the beach…

WB (White Balance): Auto is okay, EXCEPT:

    o Indoors: Bulb. Canon DSLR’s are NOTORIOUS for crappy indoor WB. Just remember to reset it to ‘auto’ when you go outside! Or: get used to doing adjustment on your computer, eg with “Canon Digital Photo Review” application/etc
    o Sunrise/Sunsets: Auto-WB will ‘fight’ the beautiful colors at sunrise/sunset, so choose a setting that ‘looks nice’ in your LCD (ie, don’t assume that ‘Sun’/’Noon’ setting is correct for sunsets/sunrises!)

INTERMEDIATE SETTINGS & Concepts to Maximize Picture-Quality:

AF (auto-focus): Fix the auto-focus target to the middle of the screen. This way you always know what’s being focused-on(!!)

    o …then you can ½-click the shutter-release, hold, & re-position your framing for the composure you want, & your subject’s face (&/or ‘most-important point’: cf ‘Golden Mean’/Rule-of-3rds below) will still be in focus

Metering: Choose ‘spot’ exposure-metering: this will also be in the center of the screen, so now whatever you focus on, will be optimally exposed…

    o Ideally, focus on your subject’s face, and now that will be in focus, and exposed correctly… And your shot will look great, even if other parts of the shot blow-out (too bright) or get crushed (too dark).
    o Occasionally your subject will be moving too fast, so learn to either
    § Quickly switch the Metering back to ‘Evaluative’, -or-
    § Aim at something with a similar exposure at a similar focal depth (often the subject’s shirt, etc)
    § Advanced: you can set the camera to set exposure separate from the shutter-release, ie with a different button (cf Canon “Custom Settings”, etc). Then you can set exposure once for a series of shots, & not worry (& it will increase your frames-per-second significantly)

Composure/Focus Target: “Rule of 3rds/Golden Mean”

    o Wide Shot: The person’s body is in focus, & place them at one of the ‘corner’ points of the ‘grid lines’ (ie, the optional rectangle, ~1/3 inset from edge-of-frame, ‘square within a square’ of the viewfinder):
    o Medium Shot: Their torso is at a corner point
    o Close-Up: Their face is at a corner-point
    o Super-close-up: Their eye is at a corner-point
    Rule: as long as their eye(s) are in focus, the shot is in focus. If the eye(s) aren’t in focus, it isn’t ‘creative focus’, it’s just blurry :-(

Creating blurry backgrounds, or ‘bokeh’:

    1. Widen your aperture to max
    2. Zoom-in as much as you can (ie, max the telephoto)
    3. Increase the distance between your Subject & the background
    Note: there is often an inverse relationship between aperture & zoom: until you invest in expensive ‘fixed-aperture’ zooms, most zooms decrease the aperture as you zoom-out. This is to avoid bad optical problems, such as pincushion distortion, color fringing, etc, but WRECKS the bokeh(!). So: practice with your zoom, & find the optimal zoom distance which allows some level of bokeh. Here’s a few guidelines:
    o f/5.6 or above is usually extremely difficult to get good bokeh. Use f/4 or wider if possible
    o Wide-angle, eg under 24mm focal length, is difficult to get good bokeh, unless you’re shooting f/2.0 or wider.

SHOOT WITH RAW:

    o Yeah, there’s lots of arguments/religious warfare re. “JPEG is Faster” & “I can edit my JPEGs JUST FINE”
    o Ignore those ppl. Once you open a RAW file in the native software (eg, Canon Digital Picture Professional, or Nikon (whatever?)– RATHER THAN ADOBE RAW– you will unlock amazing levels of super-clean adjustment: from exposure, white-balance, color-correction, sharpness… to simply zooming-in & reframing: VERY VERY CLEAN.
    o The only time to not shoot RAW, is if you absolutely must need super-fast burst, &/or have no spare memory card. Sure, the file is bigger, so get a faster laptop, & back-up media…
    o Correspondingly- unless you’re a professional on daily-turnaround assignment, there is no reason to shoot “RAW + JPEG”. You’re just slowing the camera down, making the file fatter, & you can do all that afterwards on your laptop… w/ arguably better quality.

THREE RECOMMENDED ‘PICTURE PROFILES’ (to be used as a ‘starting-point’):

    · Indoors:
    o Purpose: to shoot without flash as much as possible indoors, you need to get the shutterspeed at least 1/125
    o Av, aperture wide-open
    o ISO: 800 or 1600 (test!)
    o WB: ‘Bulb’/Incandescent.
    o Lens: wide as possible, no more than 50mm zoomed-in, or you will lose a lot of light

    · Outdoors:
    o Purpose: Shoot without a flash with as much bokeh as possible.
    o Av, aperture wide-open (unless you’re overexposing at ISO 100 or below)
    o ISO: 100-200 for noon/bright light, more if you’re zooming w/ a non-fixed aperture lens. 400-800 at dusk is fine.
    o Lens: zoomed-in as much as possible.
    o WB: Auto… Except at sunset!
    o Subject: Ideally subject is as far away from the background as possible.
    NOTE: Avoid having the sun behind you: the subject will have a lot of front-on, flat/uninteresting light (or at noon, they’ll be washed-out). Similarly, avoid direct overhead ‘noon’ light: it creates harsh shadows & is really unflattering to faces.
    Much Better to have the sun behind or on-profile to your Subject! This allows the sun to create highlights or ‘rim light’ against their hair, etc.

    · Portraiture
    o Purpose: Shoot with as much bokeh as possible.
    o Av, aperture wide-open (unless you’re overexposing at ISO 100 or below)
    o ISO: 100 or lower, for minimal ‘gain’ artifacting
    o Lens: zoomed-in as much as possible.
    o WB: ‘bulb’ if indoor, auto if outdoor.
    o Subject: with back or profile to the sun, allowing the sun to create highlights or ‘rim light’ against their hair, etc. Get the person out from under direct sunlight, & position something white’ish nearby to ‘bounce’ the sunlight on their face… Also, Ideally the subject is as far away from the background as possible.

Recommended Lenses (of course, this is a personal preference, but many top shooters have found this a good ‘starting-point’):

    · 24-105 f/4.0L – Fixed-aperture ‘L’ lens, terrific “walking-around” lens w/ great bokeh, esp fully zoomed-in.
    · 70-300 f/4.0-5.6L – Fantastic image-quality super-zoom. 4 stops of dual-mode IS, focuses in near-dark, & pin-sharp at 300mm wide-open(?!) Its nearest competitor is the 100-400 f/4.0-5.6L, which has 12yr-old technology, & is really outclassed…
    · 50mm f/1.8 or f/1.4 – This is a prime (non-zoom), & perfect for indoors. Super-fast, & good ‘portrait’ distance. The f/1.8 is a very low-price lens, & not built as robust, but the optics are good
    · 100mm f/2.0 – This is a prime/non-zoom, which will have terrific bokeh at f/2.0
    · 135mm f/2.8 ‘soft focus’ – I would borrow/test this lens; soft focus is pretty soft, ideal for portraiture, but I personally like the option to selectively blur in photoshop/etc

HOPE THAT HELPS!!
Now get out there & SHOOT!!! :-)

PS: If you want More where this came-from, check-out my post: “Does your Shot Work?

Does your Shot ‘Work’ ?

Sunday, April 5th, 2009

Let’s start w/ the Mechanics:
a) Focus. Can you see their eyes (or most-important eye), CLEAR & CRISP
-there’s no fall-back; everything else can be blurred, but NOT the eyes…

b. Light. Can you SEE what’s important, & it’s picked-out clearly
-Key: can i pick-out the salient details
-Fill: are the surroundings lit too, (keeping) the most-important stuff from being too harsh
-Rimmed/Backlit: is the most-important part ‘framed’
…not necessarily (exactly) like a ‘Studio’ shot
…but otoh– if you can get that ‘sense’ in a ‘live’ shot, you’re doing great

c. Motion/Direction. Are our eyes PULLED to the most-important part of the image??
…& this same thing works for moving shots or static too:
-> is the most-important thing, MOVING.
-static shots: from physically moving, ‘capturing the moment’
…them ‘holding-still’– but can you see their ‘interest’, do their thoughts move…
…& if it’s a flower, can you see how it (has) moved, eg towards the sun?
…& if it’s a building, can you see how light moves across its surface?
-motion shots (ie. filmmaking):
…if the key Player isn’t moving, then move the camera: even the (slightest) of Push-In’s
…or cut-in to CU, SCU, ECU…
…it can even work w/ a jump-cut [or even CinemaScope: cf Gandalf & Frodo's intercut ECU's when deciding which fork to take, inside of Moria, "Fellowship"]

.
…but most-important of all:
Does the Moment Tell a Story.

-Beginning, Middle, End
-Who, What, Where, When, Why, How

The Best shots are “Character-Moments”
-they tell us something about Who They Are
-they tell us something about What they’re Thinking
-they tell us something about How they Feel

.
…& here’s a few of my Favorite Tech Tricks:
1) ‘Pin’ the auto-focus to the center-point.
-that’s where the spot-meter is…
(you can always zoom-in, 1/2-press the shutter to set exposure & focus, & zoom-out, change framing, etc…)
-> “Always Expose for what’s in Focus”
…& let the rest blow-out or get crushed, no-problem… :-)

2. Shoot Long, & as-Open-as-possible
-maximize your bokeh!
-ie, f/4 maximum! Borrow a 50mm f/1.4 lens, & see what “really cool backgrounds” does for your shots!
-> “lots of bokeh” = “instant Production-Value”
…if nothing else, it means “this shot wasn’t taken with a consumer camera” :-)

3. Shoot Burst
-ppl’s expressions change fast; so maximize your chances of getting the shot
…you can always delete extra shots later…
…invest in several 4GB CF cards; heck they’re $35 now(?!) :-)

4. Put the ‘most-important part’ on a ‘Golden Mean’ point
(…ie, the ‘square within a square’ of the viewfinder):
-WS: the person’s figure
-MS: the person’s face
-CU: the person’s eyes
-ECU: the person’s (most-important) eye
…for more about the ‘Golden Mean’, check out Bare Bones Camera Course for Film and Video by Tom Schroeppel

5. Shoot CMOS !!
…CMOS renders facial tones much, much better than CCD
…CCD’s just don’t blow-out or crush nearly as ‘creamy’; they always look a bit ‘crisp’, ‘digital’… ie, “posterized”.
-easiest test? shoot a face, in a dark room, by candlelight.

.
…oh & BTW?
…if these Shots were’re talking-about are of my Daughter?
-fuckkit– i’m taking a TON
…& i won’t have any kind of discrimination–
…b/c i can see so much in her Look, in her Thoughts
…& each tells a Story, a Story i really care about :-D

…so sorry about that :-P

PS: If you want More where this came-from, check-out my post: “Getting the Best out of your DSLR

Sony V1U Review… it’s DOF…

Wednesday, April 25th, 2007

ROCKS.

That’s it. Full review.

Oh, you want some more? Okay then–

I just got back from Snaders 2007, & yet another ‘heads-up’ between the top HDV cam’s. What are my comparitors?

  • visual quality
  • useability
  • features

…in that order. Basically, I figure what’s the use of a great lens, if you can’t focus it? (*cough* Canon *cough*). Or if the chips display a ‘messy’ image, etc. We’re comparing ‘complete packages’ here, lens + viewfinder + chips + recording format. The object being, how to get the best looking image out of the camera, suitable for broadcast and/or film-out (cf Billups’ book).

Another guideline is “utility”, or if you will, “simplicity”. If in order to make a camera work at its best, one needs tons of outboard peripherals, this is not a good thing. Example: if you have a great lens, but the viewfinder’s low quality necessitates using a broadcast monitor in order to focus accurately, you’ve just eliminated ‘run & gun’ type shooting. Correspondingly, if you need an extended “DOF Adapter”, then why use a small-format camera? You might as well shoot with a shoulder-cam, & get the better chips & better recorded format, & when you tally rental fees, might cost nearly the same.

Beyond all that, here’s the brass tacks:

Despite all the FUD re. the difficulty of getting short DOF w/ the 1/4″ chips of the V1U, getting short DOF is actually quite easy… due to the length of the lens (20x vs. the normal 12x of the Z1U, HVX200, etc). From 5′ away, I was able to shoot face-size objects, & throw objects 5″ further away, significantly out of focus. This is incredible– usually, one expects needing to sit waaay back, & zoom waaay in to get this kind of short-DOF performance. Nope– instead, at 5′ away, you’re well-within the normal (read: tight) tolerances available to the indie filmmaker, shooting in a borrowed apartment. You can easily shoot a cinematic two-shot in a living-room, from 5′ away, & rack between their faces.
And the focus was a dream, due to the excellently-executed peaking circuit. Multiple levels, multiple colors (I just chose white / bright), & a very narrow ‘notch’ of range, worked flawlessly together to create a focusing experience that was far closer to the CineAlta than I’d've ever expected.

Please check out my last review re. my experience focusing the other 3 cams… from the low-res of the XL-H1, to the wide peaking ‘notch’ of the JVC, & the ‘subtle’ peaking of the Z1, I was just not too impressed with the whole idea of peaking on the handicam form-factor. Well, hold the presses– peaking on the V1U reminded me strongly of the brightness, crispness, & tightness displayed by the CineAlta viewfinder standing right next to it… which cost ~3x the price of the entire V1 unit :-D

I was actually rack-focusing a cheeto, from the front to the back, & then further back to the pretzel, & then out of the bowl to the gambling chips nearby. This is just astonishing… you just don’t get this kind of short DOF with the HVX (or PD150)… & (almost) that much w/ the JVC. This tells me that the lens-length is key here, not the chip-size.

& let’s not get started w/ CMOS… more contrast-range than CCD, & better: more ‘organic’ response. From skin-colors which are reproduced more believably, to what you can only call an ‘organic knee’ that occurs when you shoot blown-out/specular highlights (try shooting a light-bulb, or a candle, in a dark room)… the image looks smooth, organic, like one of those Kodak adverts… completely missing the ‘crunchyness’ which occurs in CCD-generated footage.

Plus 24p. Plus a pretty-good cinegama mode. Plus fantastic form-factor & button-layout.

This is the “PD150 with 24p” we’ve been waiting for all these years… but look–

  • 1080/24p
  • 3x CMOS chips
  • fantastic lens
  • truly best-in-class viewfinder
  • histogram to monitor image density
  • peaking -and- zebras, at the same time

…simply brilliant. An absolute winner.

Mortgage something, honey. Me gots to buy…

The New HD/HDV Cam’s

Thursday, February 2nd, 2006

Holy frickin’ crap. Just back from Snader’s, w/ some hot hands-on reviews:
The Panasonic HVX200 has a great viewfinder, much better matched with the lens than the DVX100A. The image & quality reminds me strongly of the PD150 viewfinder. Peaking has a very tight range, so it’s clear when you’re focused. The camera has decent build-quality overall, & a pretty-great lens. Fantastic quality imagery, especially in still shots, as noted in Wilt’s DV.com article.
The JVC GY-HD100U: I had pretty-high hopes for this camera, mostly b/c of the promise of true 720/24p HDV & that Fujinon mechanical lens. Well, it does have the mechanical lens, & it is great… but there some annoying issues. First, JVC still hasn’t defeated that ‘vertical line’ problem. If you look closely, there is a faint vertical line visible in the footage (kinda like the horizontal line on old Sony Trinitrons), with the left side of the frame tinted reddish, & right side brownish. We tested an old camera (really obvious, even at 0dB gain), & then a brand-new one. The new unit had the effect much less, but still present: the ‘line’ was obvious at high gain, with the same left/right pink/brown chroma tinting. At 0dB gain, the ‘line’ was nearly invisible on a 50″ Panasonic plasma monitor, but the pink/brown left/right tinting was still distinguishable. And that’s not all– as Wilt noticed, the footage from this camera is remarkably noisy, even at 0dB gain… & this was shooting a ‘demo viewstage’ (ie, ‘beauty-shots’) setup by Snaders for the camera shootout(!!) But the manual lens is great. And the viewfinder is not bad… but the peaking has a pretty wide range, so it’s not clear where critical focus is. Overall, a miss (& we haven’t even talked about motion-footage yet).

The Canon XL H1: Bigger & better-built than the original XLx units. It’s more solid, & a bit heavier, but the ergonomics have been improved — it ‘hefts’ better. It’s the first XLx form-factor whose ergonomics ‘make sense’. Plus there’s that fantastic-quality, long lens. However, that lens has the non-mechanical ‘fly-by-wire’ action… which is somehow not as tight/solid as the HVX200′s. Also there’s notibly more ‘breathing’/drifting as you rack-focus. And the viewfinder is gawd-awful compared to the other two; it’s extra-gained, with a ‘dot-grille’ effect which just looks crude. Peaking is pretty good, however.

…& now let’s talk about HDV -vs- HD in the actual footage’s “quality of motion”. It’ll be an in-depth, technically succulent comparison. Here goes:
“HDV sucks, & HD wins.”

That’s it. There’s really no better way to demonstrate this, than to let the Manufacturer’s do it themselves:

Canon: for the Canon demo, all the HDV motion footage was captured via HD-SDI to DVCProHD 100Mbit playback. Oh really! The only HDV capture + HDV playback was a series of locked-off shots with minimal intra-frame motion, & zero camera-motion. The Canon Rep back-pedalled to the audience: “well, you really need to show ‘beauty-footage’ in Demo’s like this”. He didn’t have any HDV-captured motion footage to play-back in native HDV.

JVC showed HDV-captured footage, but of well-lighted interiors. No long or wide shots.

Panny otoh showed long, short, outside, into-the-sun… all clips have been previously posted online, but now seeing them via high-end projector, they were stunning. They also had a 3-way footage-comparison clip, showing where motion, chroma, & noise artifacts really hamper Canon, Sony, & JVC’s HDV. But the best thing? The Rep was more-than-willing for me to shoot several minutes direct to P2, & then play-back on the Panasonic production monitor. Whip-pans, difficult lighting, crash-zooms, speedy rack focuses… the HVX200 ate them for lunch, w/ beautiful flesh-tones & over/undercranked footage to boot.

Conclusion:
I’d speculated before that even if the new Panny HVX200 had good imagers & lens, they would probably attach a not-great viewfinder to it (ie, “you don’t dare shoot features w/o a production monitor”, a la DVX100A/B). Well, I’m wrong, & thank bog. Sure the P2 cards are expensive, & the FireStore 100GB drive even more expensive. Regardless, this camera, in the right shooter’s hands, is going to step all over the SDX-900, & Sony DigiBeta. The jury’s still out on footage comparisons with Varicam… but it’s increasingly hard to see the difference on a large HD production monitor, let-alone on medium-end (circa $4,000) HD projection. All I know is, the camera was absolutely mobbed by working Documentary DP’s & Directors, all putting in their orders, and/or building up their chops for upcoming gigs. Welcome to the future.
And Sony? The only conclusion from the multiple working DP’s I’ve talked to: “Sony’s HDV has made all the wrong decisions” and “Not useable for exteriors, or run-’n-gun, b/c of the codec difficulties”. The [only] good news for Sony: lots of ppl like the new A10. I saw nightclub footage at +18dB gain which looked darn good… low grain, decent latitude, & the red’s had almost nil chroma-bleed. Wow. Too bad you can’t set aperture.

Thoughts on the new HVX200 “true HD” camera

Saturday, November 5th, 2005

Lots of noise is flying around about the Panasonic HVX200 “true HD” unit… from the ‘reasonable’ price ($6k) to its need for pricey P2 cards ($2k for 8min at full HD). And whereas lots of ppl are ecstatic at the thought of true 100Mbit/sec HD in a DVX100A form-factor, the thought of having to cough-up $2k for each 8min-capacity P2 card is generating a bit of ire. “Why can’t we just connect a harddrive to the unit” ppl are asking.

Actually, the technical reason for the P2 card in the HVX200 is that of bandwidth… b/c there ain’t a drive in existence which could handle ‘true HD’ (ie, 100Mbit/sec, vs. the 25Mbit/sec of HDV) on an ongoing basis… & certainly not via firewire. The way the Kinetta solves this, is via multiple drives striped in raid-3. So regardless if the costly P2 is Panny’s ‘stealth markup’ for the HVX200, it also solves the issue of how to handle 4x the bandwidth DV/HDV/firewire can do.

The more interesting question is that of optics & imager of the HVX200… Who really cares if a P2 can record 4x more data than an XL2 (or DVX100A), if the resulting image just looks like an upsampled DVX100A. Considering Panny’s track-record of not really matching the viewfinder & lens well in the DVX100A (ie, don’t even try to get critical focus w/ that v/f; you need an on-set production monitor)… i’m expecting the HVX200 lens to drastically outperform its v/f.

What i’m hoping the HVX200 does well is DV50/24p. At 4:2:2 colorspace, that P2 card should hold 40min+, & [should] outperform Sony’s Z1… if not the SDX-900.

But don’t count-out a good v/f & solid manual lens… repeatable rack-focus is a pearl of great price, creative-shooting wise. Ie, that JVC camera (even using 25Mbit HDV) could beat them all…