Archive for December, 2005

Boobs!

Tuesday, December 20th, 2005

I think every (successful) site on the internet has boobs — it’s part of making a page:
“html, boobs… okay, we’re done here”

…well, as long as we are, we should partake of the highest of quality:
Boobs!

Frank Frazetta was of the Golden Age of Fantasy… when Conan & Kane were savage-yet-intelligent, & women were serious ass-kickers who looked good doing so. When I look at the cover-art on recent Fantasy & Sci-Fi, that pseudo/neo-realistic crap with garish colors & invariably non-proportional limbs, I just get depressed.
But then I just go look at Frazetta, & all is well in the world again. Enjoy!

“Liberal” ?= “Traitor”

Tuesday, December 20th, 2005

[from a post on VX2k message-board] by John Cline:

I just want to know how “liberal” became a bad thing. The following is from The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition:

LIBERAL:
A) Not limited to or by established, traditional, orthodox, or authoritarian
attitudes, views, or dogmas; free from bigotry.
B) Favoring proposals for reform, open to new ideas for progress, and
tolerant of the ideas and behavior of others; broad-minded.

CONSERVATIVE:
A) Favoring traditional views and values; tending to oppose change.
B) Traditional or restrained in style
C) Moderate; cautious
D) Archaic

EASY. When the NeoCon’s successfully wrapped themselves in the American Flag (& the Dem’s, lead by Kerry, refused to), all political discourse reverted to “love it [Rep's] or leave it [Dem's]“. These same NeoCon’s are also well-versed in their Third Reich Propaganda techniques:

Hitler (“Mein Kampf”): “the technique of the ‘Big Lie’ consists of telling a lie so ‘colossal’ that no one would believe anyone ‘could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously’”.
[Hello? What did Bush just announce, not 48hrs ago? "Our information was Wrong about Iraq." Oopsie. But hey-- let's admit it now, so our Rep buddies in Congress can weather their re-election blues next year, & not get waxed like the 'Patriot Act' just did].

-and-
Goering (Nuremberg trials): “It is natural for the common people to not want war but, after all, it is a country’s leaders who determine policy and it is an easy matter to convince the people. Whether they have a voice or not, the people can always be made to do what their rulers wish. It’s easy. All you have to do is tell them they are under attack and condemn the pacifists for their lack of patriotism and for exposing their country to danger.”

…& lest one thinks this is a ridiculous accusation, Bill “Fair & Balanced” O’Reilly himself is an avid reader of Third Reich techniques:

Bill Oreilly (“The Oreilly Factor”, Jan 24, 2000): “Hitler and Joseph Goebbels understood that if you say something loud and long enough many people will believe it. A good journalist’s first priority should be to separate propaganda from fact — but sometimes its very hard to do that. ”

“Very hard”, I’m sure. Two words, Bill:
S H U T – U P !!!!!

where the Consciousness Movement went wrong

Friday, December 9th, 2005

So back to why the discussion of “ego” has been ‘programmed-out’, if you will, in many of the western intuitive/meditative disciplines today.

The reduction of Ego is systemic in traditional Eastern training– you shut-up, & practice. The Teacher is Right, so again– shut-up, don’t question, & do the same [basic] training, over&over&over. And in the same way that this kind of ‘basic training’ often helps you break-down bad [physical] habits — such as standing-meditation for hours teaches the body to stop using hard muscular force (by dint of painfully screaming muscles) — a similar mental submersion of one’s will to that of someone else is a very effective technique to diminsh one’s ego’s ‘lock’ on one’s personality.

But we in the West have no patience for that. If only i had a nickel for every Martial Arts Teacher who said, “traditionally you’d have to practice [this technique] for a year before you get the next one, but we teach you all 3 the first day”. IOW, “forget all that ‘mental’ stuff, & let’s get to the ‘good stuff’”. How many of you have gone to Yoga or T’ai Ch’i classes, whose Teacher never even mentions the word ‘meditation’? Well, this is not a ‘win’.

Nevertheless, with all the excesses racked-up by Guru’s in West, the whole idea of the guru-chela relationship is viewed with some suspicion… & for good reason. We would rather to treat our Teachers initially with a bit of deference, a bit of respect over time, but certainly not ‘putting-aside’ our own ego’s, thank you very much. But perhaps we’ve thrown the baby out with the bathwater?

Actually, I think it’s more of the lingering residue of Hubbard & Erhardt, whose mental beliefs still can be found all over what’s left of the Consciousness Movement. Those two did a startlingly good job gleaning some of the more powerful mental practices of various eastern spiritual disciplines, combined it with some military boot-camp confrontational tactics, & invested it with a tremendous load of obfuscatory, pseudo-mystical belief.

On the one hand, many of those techniques are effective, even quite powerful. But on the other hand, the [schools] in which they are taught often turn-out ppl more messed-up than when they started… as much psychosis, if you will… but now with a whole lot more mental decisiveness, “Certainty” if you will, as well as unstoppable belief in their inner ‘Rightness’. Their egos, as Chogyam Trungpa, would say, have been “reinforced by spiritual techniques”.

I’d love to get a similar nickel for each person I’ve met who after year(s) in a meditative community/discipline, comes-out with an (insufferable) conviction of their own Rightness, & a huge interest in sharing it with everyone around them. Perhaps Erhardt’s masterstroke was tying-together his students’ conviction in their own ability to “Get It”, with the number of fellow students they’d recruited.

I always want to say, to those who come to my door hoping to save my Immortal Soul, “I’m so very happy you’ve discovered Truth or Spirituality; I’ve found my own too, let’s share what we’ve learned with each other!” But that, unfortunately, only results in them smoothly switching to another of their well-rehearsed scripts, along the lines of “Your Truth isn’t any good; ours is the Right one”.

Alas. I’ve read a few books, been in a few schools, ‘been meditating for some years… I bet we’d've had a fun conversation… if it only could start.

“A romantic-comedy about Avian Flu”

Friday, December 9th, 2005

I’ve watched the career of George Clooney for several years, from his “why did he leave a successful show” ER-years, to his “Batman” boondoggle, to his (unsuccessful) season of “keep-women-away-I’m-training-for-an-Oscar”, & then on to his low-profile film-wise for the past few years. Looks like all that has changed.

Sporting a Hollywood good looks & “guy-next-door” likeable smile, Clooney is a “Costner gone bad” Red-State Nightmare now that he’s fronting not one but two controversial films this year. But what’s great about him, is his complete understanding & utter self-effacement of what all this “means” to his career.

on TV last night:
Somewhat Annoyed (Female) Interviewer: “What do you say to the ppl who just think, Here’s another elite Hollywood Liberal, out to save the world?”
Clooney: “Well, I don’t want to save the whole world, just a little part of Hollywood”.
Still More Annoyed (& Flustered) Interviewer: “Well, after going after the Media, & then the CIA, who are you going to go-after next?”
Clooney: “At this point in my career, I’m lucky that I can get a few of these films made… but for not much longer, I think. So my next film will be a comedy”
Astonished Interviewer: “A romantic comedy?”
Clooney: “Sure. A romantic comedy… about Avian Flu”

Perfect.