Archive for August, 2005

I don’t get it

Monday, August 22nd, 2005

if ppl are gonna do a job, then they should just do the darn thing, right? Or quit, maybe, & try something else? Because “life is too short”, & all that? Oh nevermind.

So anyway, we all know & understand the put-upon petty bureaucrat who hates [his] lot in life, & tends to take it out upon all & sundry. A wonderful (& wonderfully prevalent) example is the just-this-side-of-hostile toll-booth takers in SF, who often seem to compete in how sloooooow they can receive EXACT CHANGE. But hey– they’re paid shit, I can imagine doing the exact same thing, so I can’t knock them… at least, not when I’m not stuck in a long, non-moving toll-booth line… Grrrrr.

Er, but how about highly-paid Managers, for example? For publically-traded, SEC-accountable firms?

Those of us who [chose] to avoid the “Management Track” & remain “Technical Drones” or whatever, had very clear reasons for doing this (besides the chance to miss-out on 25-50% more pay, for starters). And a LOT of those reasons had to do w/ getting to stay being ‘techie dorks’, & avoiding all the ‘press-the-flesh’ & ‘kissing-babies’ BS that the average Mgr has to negotiate.

And that’s great! The onus being– if you wanna be a techie dork, & don’t wanna play the “be nice to ppl” game (ie, politics)… you’d better be quite hot at the techie bits, no?

Correspondingly, if you wanna be ‘political player’ (ie. “Manager”), don’t you have to [remember] to keep kissing the right ass?

Bog save me from frickin idiots who call themselves “Technical Managers” who both can’t find their technical asses w/ both hands, and don’t bother being nice to those who can. It’s as if they held the power of “hire/fire” in their grubbly little non-technical hands, & knew they were untouchable… gobbling-up all credit for anything their ‘team’ produces, & smoothly passing-the-buck back down for any issues. Oh wait, I guess that’s all true. Nevermind.

But anyway, I have a very strong (theoretical, to be sure) appreciation for an honest whore. They have their price, & tend to perform adequately when it’s paid. Example: in a very large & shiny building I once worked, there were a stream of very healthy & well-dressed damsels whose entire role, it appeared, was to leap forward & open the door smilingly to arriving Executive-types. I had occasionally noticed this curious process as I walked-by, & wondered what must being going-thru the minds of said damsels… or, at least, what was the going cost of each paid-for smile. So one day, due to some unmentionably bad karma, I arrived late at the building & managed to slip just ahead of a passel of ‘business-casual’ dressed guys spewing from a large stretched limo. As I hurried up to the door, one of the afore-mentioned hotties leaped into action, & swung the door open for me, showering me w/ a very fetching smile. “Gee” i thought, “I don’t remember this happening before”. And almost on cue, her (expensive) smile dropped 3cm, & the temperature of her face dropped 30degreesF… b/c she’d just noticed my “HI I work Here” badge.

So what does she do?
She slams the door in my face!
No, I’m not kidding!
& I nearly died laughing!!
Which made her even more irate!
& I laughed even harder!!

…b/c I knew exactly how she felt, having myself done crap jobs like sliming fish & smiling at reptiles… there is one, & only ONE thought going thru [her] mind:
“I’m being PAID for this”

…& clearly she wasn’t being PAID to be nice to me.
HAHAHAHAHAHA!! :-D

. . .
So back to highly-paid ‘take-no-prisoners’ “Managers” who treat their directs like shit.
You know what, you gotta wonder at ppl like this, who never seem to realize, that these very ppl they’re treading-on, are the very ppl who make that’s Manager’s ‘Successes’. And word gets around– crappy Managers soon don’t have anyone of quality working for them any longer.

Mark Twain once said “the principle difference between a man & a dog, is that if you take-in a starving dog & feed it, it won’t bite you”.

Lemme update that & say: “Man is the [only] animal who will gleefully, cheerfully, chop-off his nose to spite his face”.

In ethics class it’s called “Invincibly Ignorant”, & refers to those dwelling in ivory towers, etc. Why not just say, “never had a real job in their whole life (ie., really ‘work’ for a living)”, & leave it at that.

…till next time, try out this handy-dandy tool to deal with managerial pricks. It’s called the “white mutiny“. Enjoy.

{& just for giggles– why not post your own funny work “painful waste-of-space” story for others to read…}

teach them everything you know

Saturday, August 20th, 2005

Lou Holtz (spectacularly winning coach of Notre Dame) was well-known for teaching everything he knew to his coaching staff…. w/ the result that many of them left Notre Dame & became famous college & professional coaches elsewhere. So he was once asked, “aren’t you worried that you’re ‘giving it all away’?”

& Lou said “no! I teach them everything I know, & want them to be the best coaches they can.”
but the questioner persisted– “but aren’t you concerned they just take everything you’ve taught them & leave?”

& Lou said “no. I’ve got a waiting list a mile long of all the best Assistant Coaches in the country, who all want to coach at Notre Dame. And thus we get the [benefits] of their abilities for 2+ years while they’re learning… I think that’s a fair bargain”.

…& this is just as true in the workplace.
The Manager who keeps information, skills, & decisions close-to-the-vest is not investing in either the wellbeing of his personnel, nor the viability or effectiveness of his Team as a whole. I’ve met quite a few seasoned managers who proudly declaim “you’ve gotta keep technical ppl on a short leash; they always seem to want to ‘dress-up’ the requirements with the latest/sexiest bells’n'whistles. You’ve gotta ‘rein-them-in’”.

And that can usually work reasonably well in the short-term; you will deliver exactly what the Business asked-for, & probably in a timely manner. The problem is, over time, you’ll notice that those [solutions] being delivered by your Team aren’t very creative anymore (example: just fixing the ’symptom’, rather than solving the source-problem). Since part of a good software analyst’s job is “systems analysis”, ie. optimizing business-processes, the best technical person is one who not only knows the technical details, but is creative/flexible at applying them.

But if you-as-Manager have built a habit of discouraging ‘creative thought’ from your technical team, it will be you who is in trouble, next time you bid or are tasked a big (and/or ‘interesting’) project. What you’ll find is that your best creative minds aren’t producing terrific solutions [or worse, have long-since-left for more interesting work elsewhere], & you’ll deliver less functionality, & slower, than a flexible, enthusiastic team whose members’ creativity has been rewarded.

When you hold your Team back, it’s not only their career-growth that suffers, but it’s yours as well (b/c you won’t be performing at optimum). So it’s really in your best interest to ensure that your ppl have time to explore their own solutions… even if you think they’re ‘barking up a tree’. Your job as Manager is to let them know the Strategy, check-in once in a while to see if they need any escalations, & then get the hell outta the way.

If you cannot set direction, delegate, support your ppl no matter what, & always take full responsibility… it won’t just be that you’ll be a [bad] manager of a low-morale group…

…you’ll also be severely outperformed (both in the marketplace & in your own workplace) by Managers/Leaders who can.

the Joy of Working

Saturday, August 13th, 2005

“Eh?” you ask. “Joy… and Work?!”
“I can understand ‘Joy of Sex‘ — b/c hey, if if it’s ‘The Pain-in-the-Ass’ of sex, then I must be doing it wrong”. :-P

No, there really is a way to enjoy your work… regardless if you like it or not.

Let’s consider that the concept of ‘Work’ has 3 main components, so then we can address each separately:

physical– food, shelter, physical exertion
mental– decision, follow-thru
spiritual– creative, esp. creating something new

For a person to be happy, they need to be doing/making each of these, each day:
- you gotta be ‘making a living’, ie putting food in your belly & roof over your head (&/or of your dependents). Also, your body needs to move, to exercise… b/c if it doesn’t, your energy-levels fall, as does your emotional state
- you gotta make one or two decisions each day, & follow-up on them. Simple rote-work, esp. following someone else’s script, isn’t sufficient
- you gotta [feel] like you’re doing something creative, each day. You need to be able to point at something at the end of the day, & say “this is mine”

But the Secret is: NONE of these are mandatory components of your ‘day job’…. B/c as long as you get all three somewhere in your life, then you won’t expect as much from your day-job.

And that makes it easier to focus on what you are getting out of your job, b/c then you won’t be expecting it to provide what it simply can’t. Mark Twain had a quote for this: “The well-organized man is comfortable, even in hell”.

Don’t get me wrong — you can get all 3 in your ‘day job’… but it can be tough sledding to get there, sometimes. So just don’t get too upset at yourself if you don’t.

Instead, find yourself a good hobby, creative or spiritual practice, & do that daily. You’ll be amazed at how stress-free your ‘daily job’ becomes, when you know exactly why you’re doing it, & how much it can provide (& what it won’t).

…And that will put you in a much better space for when you eventually do decide to change jobs, etc. You’ll have a much clearer idea of what you want, what you’re willing to do to get it, & what you’re willing to put-up with along the way.

Because at core, you will already be fulfilled, & so whatever fulfillment the job can provide, will just be icing on the cake.

the Golden Rule

Wednesday, August 10th, 2005

a school i traversed, some years back
had a funny take on the Golden Rule, namely:
“Be nice to me, & I’ll be nice to you”.

Er, that’s approximately 180 degrees out of whack.
The real Golden Rule says:
“Be nice to everyone as you’d like them to be nice to you”.

iow, be nice first.

instead, this ‘new, improved’ version takes all the personal responsibility out of the equation, & seems to proffer a spiritual challenge, a psychic ‘prove-it’, if you will: “Be nice to me, or else.”

…funny enough, this very same school had a real issue with ego. Or rather, an incredible difficulty ever mentioning the word. Which is really ironic, b/c every single meditation school in the East (including this school’s spiritual ancestors, by way of Egyptian mystery schools, theosophy, & the like), puts primary focus on the ego.

It turns-out, there is an incredibly important reason to address the ego in spiritual practices. And it’s a very simple reason, b/c it cuts right to the heart of the matter: the more you meditate, the more your willpower increases.

That simple.
But that dangerous, if you will.

“Dangerous? Huh?!”
Sure.

Because if your ego isn’t refined, your “I want” and esp. “I want now” not put under leash, and then you gain a strong willpower, some rather not-great things can happen… to other ppl, if not your own spiritual growth.

We’ve all seen this happen to “overnight sensations”, eg. rock-stars, who become “too full of themselves”, charismatic politicians, or cult figures etc. etc…. all who are finally brought-down by an avalanche of excess. And all because they’ve lost their perspective & truly felt they “could do no wrong” or “it was all for the best”. And all that was fine when they were ‘nobodies’, b/c they could do little harm. But when they suddenly become focal points for cheering throngs of adherents, that can test the equanimity of a saint… & most ppl aren’t very saintlike.

So for the (traditional, Eastern) spiritual aspirant, there’s lots of ‘warnings’ built-into the training, alerting them to this pitfall. This is what Trungpa is talking about with his description of “the golden chain” … not only will your over-developed ego hamstring your own spiritual growth, but it will also lead you to ‘messing’ with other people.

There’s a fascinating description of this phenomena in “The Empty Mirror”, by Janwillem Van De Wetering. He’d been practicing in a traditional Japanese Zen monastary for several months, his mind had stilled quite a bit, & he had to ride a train to get his visa fixed. He saw a young cute Japanese girl on the train (the first girl he’d seen in months), & was immediately overwhelmed with lust. Casting about, he found that by focusing his intent on her, [he] got her to come over, sit by him, & even start to rub her leg against his… all w/o him saying a thing! And yet she “kept rubbing”, even though it was clear she was uncomfortable! Finally he came to his senses, relinquished his ‘mental focus’ on her, & she immediately got-up & hurried away.

Sounds crazy? I’ve seen much more dramatic displays, myself.

There’s a concept in martial arts, that the ‘yellow belt’ (couple of years intense training) has all the power of a black belt (four years plus of intense training)…. but none of the control. Bruce Lee liked to chide strong enemies in his films, pointing-out that no matter how strong they could punch, it didn’t mean much if they didn’t hit their target.

Or in other words, it doesn’t take too long for someone doing meditation to start building-up their willpower. But that doesn’t help their ego at all, esp. if their “Golden Rule” encourages a ‘me-first’ sensibility.

The fundamental pitfall of meditation (other than not doing it at all) is increased mental abilities, including willpower, visions, etc. etc. Many zen masters will say, “ignore the visions, they will go away”, & emphasize clearing the mind. Other practitioners, such as Raja Yogis (or western theosophists), instead work with those ‘visions’ to manipulate the esoteric energies in their bodies. But in the end, both [types] of practitioners focus on ego (or “attachment”, or “desire”, or “being stuck”), & how to unravel & release the ego’s effects, called “karma”.

And that’s kinda hard to do w/ the wrong “Golden Rule”.

the Test of Truth

Tuesday, August 9th, 2005

in The Chronicles of Thomas Covenant, The UnBeliever (Stephen R. Donaldson; terrific, a close second to LOTR imho), there is the concept of the “Test of Truth”.

basically, using knowledge/wisdom/experience (or “lore” for short), the Tester questions the Testee… to determine what is True. not if something specifically is ‘correct’ or not, objectively verifiable or whatever… but rather if the person is True.

there is a correlate in the ‘real world’:
What do you do if you don’t trust your shrink?

this is a fundamental question, which boils-down to–
– is it the shrink who is fucked-up, or
– is it you?

if you break it down into “information” and/or “technique”… then that is separate from personalities, & you can learn that from many different ppl. or in other words, it could be that shrink who’s fucked-up, so “go get a second opinion”.

but if it’s a question of something core… then it’s going to come up again & again.

so even then, you don’t have to ‘worry’ about it…
…unless you keep leaving & leaving.

the 12-Step programs (AA, NA, Al-Anon, OA, SA, etc) have a concept called “pulling a geographic”. iow, you leave, & (hope) that you ‘leave your troubles behind’.

unfortunately, that’s not how it works– the troubles were inside of you, you carry them with you, & thus you’re just gonna ‘find’ them again, in wherever new town you end-up in.

{…to be continued}

the ‘Four Practical Truths’

Tuesday, August 9th, 2005

so, Buddhism has an incredibly-huge canon of texts, myriads of schools, & a gen-u-wine Enlightened dude wandering around singing its praises.
Despite all that, Buddha found it useful to refine his philosophy into a simple, easily-digested mouthful, a la “Four Noble Truths”:
1) Life is Suffering
2) Suffering is caused by Desire
3) Desire can be controlled
4) Desire can be controlled by the 8-Fold Path.

…but that’s hoary & Eastern & who knows what that ‘8-Fold Path’ is, anyway?

…so w/o further ado, here’s “The Four Practical Truths” for the Practical Mystic: {with apologies to Buddha}

1) Life is Great
2) if Life Sucks, there’s just shit in your Space
3) you can clear (energy/pictures/beings) from your Space, -and-
4) Growth can be managed via the 4-Quadrant Path

choosing a School

Tuesday, August 9th, 2005

here’s a few useful guidelines for choosing a school… whether it be meditation, t’ai ch’i, filmmaking, or flower-arrangement. :-)

…usually most of us choose a school based on testimony of a friend (“hey, this place is great!”), or checking-out a top practitioner, & asking them “where’d you learn how to do that?”

To the raw beginner, most any school is better than no school… simply b/c the “getting off your a** & starting to practice” is a pretty big hurdle for most ppl. But if you have any desire to get good at what you’re practicing, it’s a good idea to scrutinize a bit:

1) did the Founder know anything => “is there any good info there”
*check historic records
*take disciples’ [gushing] accolades w/ a grain of salt
*take hand-me-down testimony, esp. from ppl who never met the guy/gal, w/ a bucket of salt
2) does the [current] Teacher know anything => “is the good info still there”
*meet them, check them out
*find others whose opinions you respect, & have them check them out
3) are the current students any good => “is the good info [still] being taught”
*there are tons of top practitioners who can’t teach worth a sh*t… eg:
-they’re “forgotten more than they know”,
-they’ve been practicing at an advanced level for so long they can’t remember how to ‘explain’ the basics to beginners…
-they’re bored and/or unenthusiastic w/ beginners
*also, sometimes some teachers don’t want ‘competition’, so subtly ‘hold-back’ their top students
-this happens a lot w/ esoteric Eastern arts [esp. if you're not a native of that culture]… they DON’T WANT to really teach you
-they’ll take your $$, & won’t mind obfuscating or letting you be stuck… for years

…& finally– notice if the ppl at the school are Happy.

…it’s like interviewing at a job– that first impression speaks volumes, & you’ll always come-back to it, years later after you’re hired:
“yeah, i remember everybody seeming stressed-out, & saying ‘oh you don’t want to work here’, but i thought they were just kidding”.
Um, no. They weren’t.

And whereas there’s some expected amount of gnarly class-experience to [overcome] (esp. w/ Martial Arts, for example)…
…that’s probably not the [environment] you want to be in, if you’re learning meditation, for example.

Happy Learning!

air karate

Friday, August 5th, 2005

in other news, i’ve been doing t’ai ch’i (“taiji”) for a while.
since ‘89, actually.

so why would anyone ever want to move real slow & look stupid?

2 words: “fast taiji”. Any good taijiist can do the movements fast, & there are some taijiists who are serious bad-asses.

i didn’t always do taiji– i started my martial-arts journey with Tae Kwon Do, that rough’n'ready Korean fighting art. i practiced doing splits (well, almost), breaking 3/4″ green pine boards, & punching 4×4″ ‘pain boards’ until my knuckles bled & the surface nerves died. the theory being, you could punch concrete (or someone’s jaw) & feel no pain. it’s true, too!

but i’ll never forget the image of Master Na, all of 33yrs or so, pitifully trying to play the trumpet with his gnarled, arthritic-like hands. Deadly, powerful fists they were, but none too flexible anymore. i figured i’d quit, & find something a bit less ruinous to my ‘guitar-playing’ hands…

for guys of a certain age, the image of the little wide-eyed kid trying to “grab the marble from my hand” of the not-much-taller big-shit-eating-grin weird-yellow-eyed blind guy is the totemic meme… it’s only the lamers who need the word “Grasshopper” added.

but that was then so i furiously sought some “kung fu” teacher, who could teach me to walk on rice paper w/o footprints & bat arrows from the air, too.

instead i found the top student of the top student of Wong Jack-Man (the guy who fought Bruce Lee to a standstill).

{more later}

spiritual competition

Friday, August 5th, 2005

…is when you say “my school is better than your school”
or “i know more/better than you”

…but the best is
“i’m oh-so-cool b/c i meditate & stuff”

Chogyam Trungpa calls this the “golden chain”, & is the last (& hardest) egoic barrier to enlightenment.

i call it the “new age curse”, & i see it everywhere, here in the Bay Area.

or as this old drunk told me, as we narrowly missed being mowed-down by a volvo while jaywalking on Telegraph,
“see that bumper-sticker? ‘Visualize World Peace’.
“You gotta watch those new-age bastards, they’ll run you down soon as look at you.
“I’ve had rednecks, school buses, even Hell’s Angels stop & let me [jaywalk] in front of them… but not those volvo-driving bastards…
“they’re ‘me-first’ all the way…”

God Bless you, Mr. Drunk. In vino veritas, or whatever. (“in wine there is disk-management software”?!) :-P

head up butt? the “growth period” defined

Thursday, August 4th, 2005

so, the meditation school i attend has this concept of a “growth period”.
it’s like when everything seems “just fine” but you nevertheless have this annoying tendency of walking into walls.

another way of putting it, is that your spirit (if you believe in such a thing) & your body (we’ve all got one of those) are just at different ‘times’ today. It’s as if one just woke up, while the other has already finished the daily chores & is off to bed.

when you feel kinda ‘psyched’ but sluggish, your “spirit is ahead of your body”. we’ve all felt this after finishing a tough climb, a long project, or [finally] getting off the phone w/ mom. it’s like we have the creative energy to go for ‘miles’, but yet can’t seem to make our body move.

when you feel energized but sorta brain-dead, that’s when your “body is ahead of your spirit”. This can happen to ppl who drink coffee at nite, experience a sudden shock, and/or are having ‘hot flashes’. we can’t seem to go to sleep, but can’t seem to do anything creative either… reading a book, watching a movie, ugh– everything ‘bores’ us pretty quickly.

{tune in later for some tips/tricks on dealing with growth periods}.

so all that sounds like fun, right?
er, why bother meditating, anyway?

all i can say is
- after a pretty depressing childhood
- years of attending shrinks
- a college-life which cemented a pattern of severe up’s ‘n down’s
- a series of post-college years spent bopping from admin (secretary, not system) to admin job, overqualified & underpaid
- the requisite series of bad relationships
- even a swing thru the Erhardtian consciousness movement & Tony Robbins

…nothing, & i mean nothing has got my head on straight like plain ‘ol meditation.

…& that’s just the ‘work’ part. ‘fixing’ yourself, if you will.
meditation is also fun– it can take you places wouldn’t've believed possible. i used to live at a veggie commune, so i’ve done my share of psychotropic experimentation, & i’ve never hit a state [back then] which i’ve not been able to get to w/ meditation…

…plus, there’s no hangover in the morning. :-D